strengths and weaknesses of teaching methods

Commonly described as a dialogue between student and teacher, the Socratic Method starts with provocative questions from the teacher. Rutten (2012), who reviewed the use of computer simulation in science education, argues: The effects of computer simulations in science education are caused by interplay between the simulation, the nature of the content, the student and the teacher. DISADVANTAGES It is a teacher-centred method and teacher talking time might be too long It is more focused on accuracy than on fluency except in the very last stage Students may get bored and unwilling to participate Since everything is scaffolded learners may not remember things not suitable for all types of learning styles. In light of such recognition, a teacher can examine his/her own practice in relation to research findings and try to explore what will happen when employing a specific teaching method in his/her own context. Reviews of teaching methods which fund . https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1839232, http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/, https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/24/contribution/47337/, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022001023, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026007004, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4, https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/23/contribution/44956/, Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health, - Competence to see students differences and needs, - School subject or area in which the method is applied, - System level: Strong external control, prevailing test discourse, Alfieri et al., 2011 (discovery-based instruction) (US, UK), Mikropoulus & Natsis, 2011 (educational virtual reality) (Greece), Norton & Toohey, 2011 (identity and language learning) (Canada), Bowers et al., 2010 (morphological instruction) (Canada), Familiarity with the method/artefact (received training or not), Competence to see students different needs, Beniti & Baretto, 2012 (robotics) (Brazil), Competence to determine when and to what extent it is appropriate to use a method (also method in relation to learning objective), Alfieri et al., 2010 (discovery-based instruction) (US, UK), Competence to design instruction in terms of tasks and classroom environment, Competence to see when explicit teaching is necessary/what level of involvement is appropriate in the teaching process, Competence to work with students at the metalevel, Davies et al., 2013 (creative learning environments) (UK), Ehri et al., 2001 (phonemic awareness instruction) (US, Canada), Level of knowledge of the method in focus, Roorda et al., 2011 (affective teacher-student relationships) (Netherlands), Benitti & Barreto, 2012 (use of robotics) (Brazil), Quality and design of methods, programs, or artefacts (nature/length of intervention), Alfieri et al., 2010 (discovery learning) (US, UK), Dignath et al., 2008 (self-regulated learning) (Germany), Strongly characterised by traditions or beliefs, Durlak et al., 2011 (socio-emotional teaching programs) (US), Insufficient knowledge at decision-making/policy levels, Sadler et al., 2010 (research apprenticeships) (US). Disadvantage: Unreliable. One of the benefits of constructivism in the classroom is that it creates an active, engaging environment for children.

Lacrosse Helmet Reconditioning, Bronwyn Thomas Ballet, Usafa Community Center Chapel, Articles S